Table of Contents
Class
Weapons
Curios
Talent Tree
Description
Looking to jump into Havocs, but don't know where to start? Getting booted from party finder because your build just isn't up to snuff? want to support your team without sacrificing on damage?
Well... Look no further! This META havoc 40 veteran build has been stress-tested by yours truly for INCREDIBLE results at any level: Whether you're queuing for an Auric Maelstrom or Diving head-first into a Havoc game with a premade group, this build will have you (and, more importantly, your team's) back no matter what you face. Rotten armour, Blight spreads - any modifier, any map, and any team comp, this build can CARRY.
WHAT CAN THIS BUILD DO?
The short answer is... anything. With the combat blade, this build has incredible mobility AND amazing single target damage into armour thanks to Uncanny strike and riposte. Through unconventionally dumping damage we optimize for absolute speed and survivability, without sacrificing the classic armour punching power that the knife has. The plasma gun does double duty as a elite and specialist sniper and horde-clear weapon, using its fantastic cleave to mulch poxwalkers and annihilate high-health priority targets. 71 thermal resistance is the bare minimum to gain an extra 8th shot - essential for maximizing our hordeclear, as we want to kill as much of the horde as possible before needing to vent our heat - while 69% charge rate allows for optimal fire rate while enabling the previously mentioned thermal resistance breakpoint. With the Gets Hot! and Rising Heat blessings, the plasma gun isn't just a weapon - it's a force of mass-destruction, leaving only goo and viscera in its cerulean blue wake.
NOTE: IF YOU CAN'T GET A PLASMA GUN WITH THESE STATS, DON'T SWEAT IT; A 60% THERMAL DUMP-STAT IS PERFECTLY ACCEPTABLE TOO, AND NEARLY AS STRONG.
We take triple toughness curios with: ability regen (for Ult spam - important for our supportive role); Extra toughness (For survivability; while gunner resistance might seem tempting, the amount of damage they deal and the fact that their suppression restricts toughness generation means that the only way to survive a gunner heavy seed is extra toughness); and, of course, stamina regeneration, so that we can sprint around with the combat blade for longer periods of time.
TALENT BREAKDOWN
Veteran is unique as a class in that all of the best talents are contained within the middle of the class tree. The best part is that ALL of these talents benefit our jack-of-all trades playstyle with the plasma gun. Thus, focusing our attention down that path is optimal for Havoc play if we want our build to be the best that it possibly can be. Covering Fire is a support powerhouse, as is Leave No One Behind and Field Improvisation. Fire Team and Bring it Down! are the crux of our damage, being an essentially better version of the mediocre Precision Strikes node with greater raw damage and fewer diminishing returns than most other veteran setups would have. The Krak Grenade, meanwhile, multiplies our boss killing potential a thousandfold. Longshot causes the plasma gun to become a machine of precise destruction, allowing you to kill anything with it so long as you have ammo.
The Aura: Fire Team .
Because of how ammo-efficient the Plasma gun already is, survivalist is actually a terrible pick for this build. Fire Team , meanwhile, buffs EVERYONE'S damage - not just yours. And that's important when Nurgle's champions are bearing down on you and your team. it doesn't matter how much ammo you have available when bullets just bounce off of everything they hit. That's the job of Fire Team - adding that extra punch, so that even the toughest foe can be brought to Judgement by the Emperor's finest.
The Ability: Voice of Command .
Golden toughness? Check. Stagger? Check. Team support? Check, check, and check again. With the ability to render your team practically Immortal for ten seconds AND REVIVE ANYONE DOWNED FOR FREE, voice of command is the strongest ability available to us. It's not just our ultimate move; it's a win button. Because when you use it, you and your team become untouchable. This is a must take for our build.
The Keystone: Focus Target!.
This is the best Keystone for our purposes: tag an enemy to render them helpless against your might. With Focused Fire, we can eke out an extra bit of damage against whatever is affected, allowing us to guarantee that either we - or one of our teammates, (buffed by Fire Team!) - can annihilate it in the emperor's name. It's also the only one we have the points for, as all of the nodes that we want are on the same branch as it - a happy accident, in our case. A must take for our build.
Playstyle
This build is fast and loose with how it approaches darktide's combat. Due to how overwhelmingly strong it is, we can break the system over our knee and control the tide of battle, so to speak. As a general rule of thumb, however, you want to stay close to your team. Prioritize shooting specials when they appear, and when hordes are too dense to mulch with your combat blade, swap to the plasma gun and unload your hot, gooey, glowing load all over those poxwalkers. If a boss appears - Krak it. Whip out those grenades and spam them at whatever is troubling your team - it won't last long; and your team will have you to thank. Make sure that you're managing your stamina well; don't run too much or too little. Always be on the move - standing still is how bombers and flamers catch you and roast you alive. The FitnessGram Pacer Test is a multistage aerobic capacity test that progressively gets more difficult as it continues. The 20 meter pacer test will begin in 30 seconds. Line up at the start. The running speed starts slowly but gets faster each minute after you hear this signal bodeboop. A sing lap should be completed every time you hear this sound. ding Remember to run in a straight line and run as long as possible. The second time you fail to complete a lap before the sound, your test is over. The test will begin on the word start. On your mark. Get ready!… Start. ding
FAQs:
To be fair, you have to have a very high IQ to understand Rick and Morty. The humor is extremely subtle, and without a solid grasp of theoretical physics most of the jokes will go over a typical viewer's head. There's also Rick's nihilistic outlook, which is deftly woven into his characterisation - his personal philosophy draws heavily fromNarodnaya Volya literature, for instance. The fans understand this stuff; they have the intellectual capacity to truly appreciate the depths of these jokes, to realize that they're not just funny- they say something deep about LIFE. As a consequence people who dislike Rick and Morty truly ARE idiots- of course they wouldn't appreciate, for instance, the humour in Rick's existencial catchphrase "Wubba Lubba Dub Dub," which itself is a cryptic reference to Turgenev's Russian epic Fathers and Sons I'm smirking right now just imagining one of those addlepated simpletons scratching their heads in confusion as Dan Harmon's genius unfolds itself on their television screens. What fools... how I pity them. 😂 And yes by the way, I DO have a Rick and Morty tattoo. And no, you cannot see it. It's for the ladies' eyes only- And even they have to demonstrate that they're within 5 IQ points of my own (preferably lower) beforehand. A molecule is a group of two or more atoms that are held together by attractive forces known as chemical bonds; depending on context, the term may or may not include ions that satisfy this criterion. In quantum physics, organic chemistry, and biochemistry, the distinction from ions is dropped and molecule is often used when referring to polyatomic ions. A molecule may be homonuclear, that is, it consists of atoms of one chemical element, e.g. two atoms in the oxygen molecule (O2); or it may be heteronuclear, a chemical compound composed of more than one element, e.g. water (two hydrogen atoms and one oxygen atom; H2O). In the kinetic theory of gases, the term molecule is often used for any gaseous particle regardless of its composition. This relaxes the requirement that a molecule contains two or more atoms, since the noble gases are individual atoms.[9] Atoms and complexes connected by non-covalent interactions, such as hydrogen bonds or ionic bonds, are typically not considered single molecules. Concepts similar to molecules have been discussed since ancient times, but modern investigation into the nature of molecules and their bonds began in the 17th century. Refined over time by scientists such as Robert Boyle, Amedeo Avogadro, Jean Perrin, and Linus Pauling, the study of molecules is today known as molecular physics or molecular chemistry. Etymology According to Merriam-Webster and the Online Etymology Dictionary, the word "molecule" derives from the Latin "moles" or small unit of mass. The word is derived from French molécule (1678), from Neo-Latin molecula, diminutive of Latin moles "mass, barrier". The word, which until the late 18th century was used only in Latin form, became popular after being used in discussions of the natural philosophy of René Descartes. History The definition of the molecule has evolved as knowledge of the structure of molecules has increased. Earlier definitions were less precise, defining molecules as the smallest particles of pure chemical substances that still retain their composition and chemical properties.[13] This definition often breaks down since many substances in ordinary experience, such as rocks, salts, and metals, are composed of large crystalline networks of chemically bonded atoms or ions, but are not made of discrete molecules. The modern concept of molecules can be traced back towards pre-scientific and Greek philosophers such as Leucippus and Democritus who argued that all the universe is composed of atoms and voids. Circa 450 BC Empedocles imagined fundamental elements (fire (), earth (), air (), and water ()) and "forces" of attraction and repulsion allowing the elements to interact. A fifth element, the incorruptible quintessence aether, was considered to be the fundamental building block of the heavenly bodies. The viewpoint of Leucippus and Empedocles, along with the aether, was accepted by Aristotle and passed to medieval and renaissance Europe. In a more concrete manner, however, the concept of aggregates or units of bonded atoms, i.e. "molecules", traces its origins to Robert Boyle's 1661 hypothesis, in his famous treatise The Sceptical Chymist, that matter is composed of clusters of particles and that chemical change results from the rearrangement of the clusters. Boyle argued that matter's basic elements consisted of various sorts and sizes of particles, called "corpuscles", which were capable of arranging themselves into groups. In 1789, William Higgins published views on what he called combinations of "ultimate" particles, which foreshadowed the concept of valency bonds. If, for example, according to Higgins, the force between the ultimate particle of oxygen and the ultimate particle of nitrogen were 6, then the strength of the force would be divided accordingly, and similarly for the other combinations of ultimate particles. Amedeo Avogadro created the word "molecule".[14] His 1811 paper "Essay on Determining the Relative Masses of the Elementary Molecules of Bodies", he essentially states, i.e. according to Partington's A Short History of Chemistry, that: The smallest particles of gases are not necessarily simple atoms, but are made up of a certain number of these atoms united by attraction to form a single molecule. In coordination with these concepts, in 1833 the French chemist Marc Antoine Auguste Gaudin presented a clear account of Avogadro's hypothesis, regarding atomic weights, by making use of "volume diagrams", which clearly show both semi-correct molecular geometries, such as a linear water molecule, and correct molecular formulas, such as H2O: Marc Antoine Auguste Gaudin's volume diagrams of molecules in the gas phase (1833) In 1917, an unknown American undergraduate chemical engineer named Linus Pauling was learning the Dalton hook-and-eye bonding method, which was the mainstream description of bonds between atoms at the time. Pauling, however, was not satisfied with this method and looked to the newly emerging field of quantum physics for a new method. In 1926, French physicist Jean Perrin received the Nobel Prize in physics for proving, conclusively, the existence of molecules. He did this by calculating the Avogadro constant using three different methods, all involving liquid phase systems. First, he used a gamboge soap-like emulsion, second by doing experimental work on Brownian motion, and third by confirming Einstein's theory of particle rotation in the liquid phase. In 1927, the physicists Fritz London and Walter Heitler applied the new quantum mechanics to the deal with the saturable, nondynamic forces of attraction and repulsion, i.e., exchange forces, of the hydrogen molecule. Their valence bond treatment of this problem, in their joint paper, was a landmark in that it brought chemistry under quantum mechanics. Their work was an influence on Pauling, who had just received his doctorate and visited Heitler and London in Zürich on a Guggenheim Fellowship. Subsequently, in 1931, building on the work of Heitler and London and on theories found in Lewis' famous article, Pauling published his ground-breaking article "The Nature of the Chemical Bond" in which he used quantum mechanics to calculate properties and structures of molecules, such as angles between bonds and rotation about bonds. On these concepts, Pauling developed hybridization theory to account for bonds in molecules such as CH4, in which four sp³ hybridised orbitals are overlapped by hydrogen's 1s orbital, yielding four sigma (σ) bonds. The four bonds are of the same length and strength. The science of molecules is called molecular chemistry or molecular physics, depending on whether the focus is on chemistry or physics. Molecular chemistry deals with the laws governing the interaction between molecules that results in the formation and breakage of chemical bonds, while molecular physics deals with the laws governing their structure and properties. In practice, however, this distinction is vague. In molecular sciences, a molecule consists of a stable system (bound state) composed of two or more atoms. Polyatomic ions may sometimes be usefully thought of as electrically charged molecules. The term unstable molecule is used for very reactive species, i.e., short-lived assemblies (resonances) of electrons and nuclei, such as radicals, molecular ions, Rydberg molecules, transition states, van der Waals complexes, or systems of colliding atoms as in Bose–Einstein condensate. Prevalence Molecules as components of matter are common. They also make up most of the oceans and atmosphere. Most organic substances are molecules. The substances of life are molecules, e.g. proteins, the amino acids of which they are composed, the nucleic acids (DNA and RNA), sugars, carbohydrates, fats, and vitamins. The nutrient minerals are generally ionic compounds, thus they are not molecules, e.g. iron sulfate. However, the majority of familiar solid substances on Earth are made partly or completely of crystals or ionic compounds, which are not made of molecules. These include all of the minerals that make up the substance of the Earth, sand, clay, pebbles, rocks, boulders, bedrock, the molten interior, and the core of the Earth. All of these contain many chemical bonds, but are not made of identifiable molecules.No typical molecule can be defined for salts nor for covalent crystals, although these are often composed of repeating unit cells that extend either in a plane, e.g. graphene; or three-dimensionally e.g. diamond, quartz, sodium chloride. The theme of repeated unit-cellular-structure also holds for most metals which are condensed phases with metallic bonding. Thus solid metals are not made of molecules. In glasses, which are solids that exist in a vitreous disordered state, the atoms are held together by chemical bonds with no presence of any definable molecule, nor any of the regularity of repeating unit-cellular-structure that characterizes salts, covalent crystals, and metals. Bonding Molecules are generally held together by covalent bonding. Several non-metallic elements exist only as molecules in the environment either in compounds or as homonuclear molecules, not as free atoms: for example, hydrogen.While some people say a metallic crystal can be considered a single giant molecule held together by metallic bonding, others point out that metals behave very differently than molecules.
THERE ARE BUGS UNDER MY SKIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIINNNNNNNNNNNNNNN